On
Thursday evening 21 November, the Leichhardt Town Hall housed a
capacity crowd to hear Pam Newton, a former police officer–turned
award-winning crime novelist in an interview with Ian Rankin about
his latest DI Rebus novel, Standing
in Another Man’s Grave.
They
were both introduced by the newly appointed Leichhardt mayor,
Cr Darcy
Byrne, who insisted that the Leichhardt Municipality was the best
place possible to host two such accomplished crime writers due to the
fact that the infamous "Lennie"
McPherson,
one of the most notorious and powerful Australian career criminals of
the late 20th century had been born and raised in the area.
But
the crowd wanted to hear about Rebus – and the fact that after five
years in retirement - Rebus is back! The character of John Rebus
lives in real time and was forty in the first novel (25 years ago),
retired 5 years ago and now he has been brought out of retirement to
work as a civilian in a cold case unit with the unfortunate acronym
SCRU (Serious Crime Review Unit).
Rankin
told the audience how he has to be vigilant to fit with the rules of
the Edinburgh Police force. And in real life, their retirement age is
60 years. Rankin amused us with the story of a member in the Scottish
Parliament who asked the Justice Minister if he’d consider changing
the retirement age of police in Edinburgh so that a fictional
detective could keep working. Apparently this didn’t endear Rankin
to his local force!
Newton
mentioned that this latest novel reintroduces some old foes, like
Cafferty, Rebus’ nemesis, who turns up to take Rebus for a drink
because he reckons he owes him for saving his life. But as readers,
we’re never sure if it’s just a friendly drink or whether there
is something going on below the surface. As Rankin said, “It’s
an interesting relationship because we’re never sure if they’re
going to become old friends or if they’re going to kill each
other.”
Rankin
went on to discuss how another old character, Malcolm Fox, usually a
protagonist, this time has to perform in the role of the antagonist,
the “bad guy”, trying to bar Rebus from returning to the force.
Rankin’s editor told him that she “didn’t like Fox now –
she’d gone off him.” So Rankin had to focus on carefully
explaining the reasons for his not wanting Rebus back and trying to
make Fox less unpleasant. He found it a challenge to see Malcolm Fox,
the hero, through the eyes of the detective whom he’s hunting.
Newton
added how interesting she found it to see Rebus from the point of
view of Fox and Fox from the point of view of Rebus. In a rare moment
Fox actually physically describes Rebus, revealing, she thought, an
incredible jealousy. She asked Rankin whether he had had fun writing
about this shifting power balance.
Rankin
responded by adding the potential conflict with Rebus’ sidekick,
Siobhan Clarke, who has emerged from his shadow and therefore is also
perhaps not so happy to see Rebus return to his former position in
the force. There was also the inner conflict of the older characters
such as Rebus, who is unfamiliar with the modern social media and
feels insecure around the younger officers and Cafferty who has to
contend with the new ways of breaking the law. But Rankin’s main
concern was how to write Fox in future books as a hero. If the reader
now dislikes him, could he get their sympathy back or will Fox always
remain “the bad guy”?
Rankin
went on to describe how constraining being true to real time can be
for an author. He confessed that he could kick himself for making
Rebus too old in the first book. He’d recently been told that the
cold case unit his character is working in is going to be wound up as
the whole Scottish Force is being restructured. He’s also
discovered, now that he has Fox in Internal Affairs, that officers
only serve in that position for 3-5 years, so he is faced with moving
Fox back to the normal CID with people he has prosecuted and who will
always hate him.
Other
challenges come with writing about real places and events, such as in
The
Naming of the Dead.
This
novel was set during the 2005 G8 Summit in Auchterarder, Scotland,
allowing for an encounter between President George W. Bush and DI
John Rebus. When the London bombings took place during the Summit
Rankin was compelled to also include them in his plot.
There are humorous incidents which lead from this too, such as when
readers visit the St Leonards Police Station or the Oxford Bar
expecting to find the fictional Rebus!
Rankin
went on to describe how his latest novel received its title: it is a
mondegreen
- a mishearing of a lyric by the Scottish songwriter and folk musician,
Jackie Levin, to whom the novel is dedicated. He was a long time
friend of Ian Rankin and they released a joint album entitled Jackie
Leven Said.
Unfortunately Levin died during the writing of the novel and Rankin
has sprinkled many of his lyrics throughout the novel in homage. The
true words are, “standing in another man's rain”.
Rankin
feels that as a crime writer he can explore everything he wants to in
his fiction - complex characters, a strong sense of place, the
pleasure of a who-dunnit with the pieces coming together to a neat
end, the vicarious thrill of a roller coaster ride for the reader,
but also the ability to look quite deeply at society and tackle the
big moral questions such as why do we continue to do bad things to
each other? What is evil? To this end Rankin investigated the nature
of evil and how it is manifested in a three-part documentary series
named Ian
Rankin’s Evil Thoughts.
In
the course of his travels, he met philosophers, theologians,
historians, neurologists, psychiatrists, criminals and victims, and
explored their widely differing notions of evil, and examined how
evil is perceived and portrayed today.
Rankin
shared his writing style with us, telling us that he makes up the
story as he goes along and that he writes as though he were Rebus, as
equally in the dark as to the identity of the killer until very close
to the end. It is only then, after the first draft is written that he
goes back to research and plug the holes so that the whole fits
neatly and completely.
We
eagerly await being illuminated by Rankin’s next book – despite
his assertions of not being sure how it will pan out as he has no
ideas for it at all. He only knows it has to be delivered in June
2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment